linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 15/26] pwm: jz4740: Add support for the JZ4725B

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYo0RrQTnjQhxG=CRa1AWoRrVjL9naYC_ZCz2_dzAz-Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:56:39 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, paul.burton@...s.com,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>, ezequiel@...labora.co.uk,
        prasannatsmkumar@...il.com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, od@...c.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 15/26] pwm: jz4740: Add support for the JZ4725B

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 3:26 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 02:50:20PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

> > So if the PWM case is something similar, then by all means add
> > num-pwms.
>
> .. or "npwms" to use the same nomenclature as the gpio binding?

Either works for me, I don't have a very high need of consistency
but there are others that have so your suggestion seems wise.

Yours,
Linus Walleij