linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts: add a tool to produce a compile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNATZm6T9bjcAxB_WQw-um-Hjkhiew6qg8CRLayr8qYzLeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 15 Dec 2018 18:37:49 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Tom Roeder <tmroeder@...gle.com>
Cc:     Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: add a tool to produce a compile_commands.json file

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:24 AM Tom Roeder <tmroeder@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> The LLVM/Clang project provides many tools for analyzing C source code.
> Many of these tools are based on LibTooling
> (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LibTooling.html), which depends on a
> database of compiler flags. The standard container for this database is
> compile_commands.json, which consists of a list of JSON objects, each
> with "directory", "file", and "command" fields.
>
> Some build systems, like cmake or bazel, produce this compilation
> information directly. Naturally, Makefiles don't. However, the kernel
> makefiles already create .<target>.o.cmd files that contain all the
> information needed to build a compile_commands.json file.
>
> So, this commit adds scripts/gen_compile_commands.py, which recursively
> searches through a directory for .<target>.o.cmd files and extracts
> appropriate compile commands from them. It writes a
> compile_commands.json file that LibTooling-based tools can use.
>
> By default, gen_compile_commands.py starts its search in its working
> directory and (over)writes compile_commands.json in the working
> directory. However, it also supports --output and --directory flags for
> out-of-tree use.
>
> Note that while gen_compile_commands.py enables the use of clang-based
> tools, it does not require the kernel to be compiled with clang. E.g.,
> the following sequence of commands produces a compile_commands.json file
> that works correctly with LibTooling.
>
> make defconfig
> make
> scripts/gen_compile_commands.py
>
> Also note that this script is written to work correctly in both Python 2
> and Python 3, so it does not specify the Python version in its first
> line.
>
> For an example of the utility of this script: after running
> gen_compile_commands.json on the latest kernel version, I was able to
> use Vim + the YouCompleteMe pluging + clangd to automatically jump to
> definitions and declarations. Obviously, cscope and ctags provide some
> of this functionality; the advantage of supporting LibTooling is that it
> opens the door to many other clang-based tools that understand the code
> directly and do not rely on regular expressions and heuristics.
>
> Tested: Built several recent kernel versions and ran the script against
> them, testing tools like clangd (for editor/LSP support) and clang-check
> (for static analysis). Also extracted some test .cmd files from a kernel
> build and wrote a test script to check that the script behaved correctly
> with all permutations of the --output and --directory flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Roeder <tmroeder@...gle.com>


I am fine with this,
but I have one question.

The generated compile_commands.json
contains $(pound)

How is it handled?
Should it be replaced with '\#' ?





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada