linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/88] 4.4.168-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5862b36-beae-4810-fb33-4b646e96378b@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sat, 15 Dec 2018 07:45:08 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/88] 4.4.168-stable review

On 12/15/18 12:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 06:10:29PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 12/14/18 3:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.168 release.
>>> There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:56:41 UTC 2018.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> Build results:
>> 	total: 170 pass: 145 fail: 25
>> Failed builds:
>> 	arm:allnoconfig
>> 	arm:tinyconfig
>> 	arm:efm32_defconfig
>> 	blackfin:defconfig
>> 	blackfin:BF561-EZKIT-SMP_defconfig
>> 	c6x:dsk6455_defconfig
>> 	c6x:evmc6457_defconfig
>> 	c6x:evmc6678_defconfig
>> 	h8300:allnoconfig
>> 	h8300:tinyconfig
>> 	h8300:edosk2674_defconfig
>> 	h8300:h8300h-sim_defconfig
>> 	h8300:h8s-sim_defconfig
>> 	m68k:allnoconfig
>> 	m68k:tinyconfig
>> 	m68k:m5272c3_defconfig
>> 	m68k:m5307c3_defconfig
>> 	m68k:m5249evb_defconfig
>> 	m68k:m5407c3_defconfig
>> 	microblaze:nommu_defconfig
>> 	microblaze:allnoconfig
>> 	microblaze:tinyconfig
>> 	sh:defconfig
>> 	sh:allnoconfig
>> 	sh:tinyconfig
>> Qemu test results:
>> 	total: 288 pass: 288 fail: 0
>>
>> mm/nommu.c: In function '__get_user_pages_unlocked':
>> mm/nommu.c:211:49: error: 'write' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> mm/nommu.c:211:56: error: 'force' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> mm/nommu.c:212:9: warning: passing argument 7 of 'get_user_pages' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
>> mm/nommu.c:185:6: note: expected 'struct vm_area_struct **' but argument is of type 'struct page **'
>> mm/nommu.c:212:9: error: too many arguments to function 'get_user_pages'
>> mm/nommu.c:185:6: note: declared here
>>
>> Details are available at https://kerneltests.org/builders/.
> 
> Ugh, I'll dig through this later on today, we must be missing something
> with those backports that Ben did...
> 
69ce144e5c3a ("mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters
with gup_flags") seems to have missed converting a call of
get_user_pages().

Guenter