lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 15 Dec 2018 18:11:45 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/142] 4.19.10-stable review

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:01:02AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:58:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.10 release.
> > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:57:12 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected.

They were?

> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 4.19.10-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.19.y
> git commit: 4875bf1f86d7bdc8dbf3222ab4028239446fab3f
> git describe: v4.19.9-143-g4875bf1f86d7
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.19-oe/build/v4.19.9-143-g4875bf1f86d7
> 
> No regressions (compared to build v4.19.9)
> 
> No fixes (compared to build v4.19.9)
> 
> Ran 18346 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

This said there were no regressions.

confused,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ