[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181215.132333.867660599141318055.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 13:23:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, pjt@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ecree@...arflare.com,
dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: mitigate retpoline overhead
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:51:56 +0100
> The spectre v2 counter-measures, aka retpolines, are a source of measurable
> overhead[1]. We can partially address that when the function pointer refers to
> a builtin symbol resorting to a list of tests vs well-known builtin function and
> direct calls.
>
> Experimental results show that replacing a single indirect call via
> retpoline with several branches and a direct call gives performance gains
> even when multiple branches are added - 5 or more, as reported in [2].
>
> This may lead to some uglification around the indirect calls. In netconf 2018
> Eric Dumazet described a technique to hide the most relevant part of the needed
> boilerplate with some macro help.
>
> This series is a [re-]implementation of such idea, exposing the introduced
> helpers in a new header file. They are later leveraged to avoid the indirect
> call overhead in the GRO path, when possible.
>
> Overall this gives > 10% performance improvement for UDP GRO benchmark and
> smaller but measurable for TCP syn flood.
>
> The added infra can be used in follow-up patches to cope with retpoline overhead
> in other points of the networking stack (e.g. at the qdisc layer) and possibly
> even in other subsystems.
...
Series applied, I'll push this out after a build check completes.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists