[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYq5Eg2DrwdED-yTZ4kMoCxew+0rdU-b4zuinOf7BEr6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:21:47 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: Jan Kotas <jank@...ence.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: Add Cadence GPIO driver
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 4:51 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
> The driver looks good but is there any particular reason not to use
> regmap for register IO?
I thought we only use regmap for MMIO when the register range is
shared (as in a system controller) so that some registers are for this,
some register or even bits in a register for some other driver, so they
need the spinlock in the regmap to protect the register range.
It is also nice for shadowing/caching of register contents I guess,
wat does this driver get from regmap MMIO?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists