[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181217072144.GQ2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 07:21:44 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: syzbot <syzbot+5399ed0832693e29f392@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:LINE!
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 10:11:04PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following crash on:
>
> HEAD commit: d14b746c6c1c Add linux-next specific files for 20181214
> git tree: linux-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13706347400000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=1da6d2d18f803140
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5399ed0832693e29f392
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental)
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=101032b3400000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16534063400000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+5399ed0832693e29f392@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:423 [inline]
> slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3365 [inline]
> kmem_cache_alloc+0x2c4/0x730 mm/slab.c:3539
> __d_alloc+0xc8/0xb90 fs/dcache.c:1599
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:1566!
> d_alloc_anon fs/dcache.c:1698 [inline]
> d_make_root+0x43/0xc0 fs/dcache.c:1885
> autofs_fill_super+0x6f1/0x1c30 fs/autofs/inode.c:273
Huh? BUG is in iput(), AFAICS, so the stack trace is rather misreported.
iput() can be called by d_make_root(), provided that dentry allocation
fails. So the most straightforward interpretation would be that we
had an allocation failure (injected?), followed by iput() of the inode
passed to d_make_root(). Which happened to find I_CLEAR in ->i_state
of that inode somehow, which should be impossible short of seriously
buggered inode refcounting somewhere - the inode has just been returned
by new_inode(), which clears i_state, and it would have to have passed
clear_inode() (i.e. has been through inode eviction) since then...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists