linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI / tables: table upgrade from built-in initrd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:05:54 +0000
From:   "Yang, Shunyong" <shunyong.yang@...-semitech.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Zheng, Joey" <yu.zheng@...-semitech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / tables: table upgrade from built-in initrd

Hi, Rafael,

  OK. I will update the description and document.

Thanks.
Shunyong.

On 2018/12/17 17:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:18 AM Yang, Shunyong
> <shunyong.yang@...-semitech.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Rafael,
>>   I think "override" is more accurate. I just follow the existing
>> description of "ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE" in drivers/acpi/Kconfig.
>>   Should I change all upgrade/UPGRADE to "override/OVERRIDE" in this patch?
> 
> I think that this would be better.
> 
> Also, there is some documentation regarding this feature in the kernel
> tree.  Should it be updated by your patch?
>