[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB5533AAAEA69A54F1CF01D44CEEBC0@VI1PR04MB5533.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:24:14 +0000
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: imx6: Invert checks in imx6_pcie_reset_phy() and
imx6_setup_phy_mpll()
On 12/17/2018 1:09 AM, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> In order to avoid having potentially ever growing list of variants
> that don't support methods implemented in imx6_pcie_reset_phy() and
> imx6_setup_phy_mpll(), change logical checks in the to check for SoC's
> that _do_ support what they implement. While at it, share the code via
> a small helper function.
>
> +static bool imx6_pcie_has_imx6_phy(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie)
> +{
> + return imx6_pcie->variant == IMX6Q ||
> + imx6_pcie->variant == IMX6SX ||
> + imx6_pcie->variant == IMX6QP;
> +}
This would be an ideal match for adding a field inside drvdata, sadly
that was part of a series which stalled:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10712261/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists