lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181217144908.GQ30879@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:49:08 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>, phillip@...ashfs.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] squashfs: enable __GFP_FS in ->readpage to prevent hang
 in mem alloc

On Mon 17-12-18 06:41:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:10:44PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 17-12-18 04:25:46, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > It's worth noticing that squashfs _is_ in fact holding a page locked in
> > > squashfs_copy_cache() when it calls grab_cache_page_nowait().  I'm not
> > > sure if this will lead to trouble or not because I'm insufficiently
> > > familiar with the reclaim path.
> > 
> > Hmm, this is more interesting then. If there is any memcg accounted
> > allocation down that path _and_ the squashfs writeout can lock more
> > pages and mark them writeback before they are really sent to the storage
> > then we have a problem. See [1]
> > 
> > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181213092221.27270-1-mhocko@kernel.org
> 
> Squashfs is read only, so it'll never have dirty pages and never do
> writeout.
> 
> But ... maybe the GFP flags being used for grab_cache_page_nowait() are
> wrong.  It does, after all, say "nowait".  Perhaps it shouldn't be trying
> direct reclaim at all, but rather fail earlier.  Like this:
> 
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1550,6 +1550,8 @@ struct page *pagecache_get_page(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t offset,
>                         gfp_mask |= __GFP_WRITE;
>                 if (fgp_flags & FGP_NOFS)
>                         gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_FS;
> +               if (fgp_flags & FGP_NOWAIT)
> +                       gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
>  
>                 page = __page_cache_alloc(gfp_mask);
>                 if (!page)

Isn't FGP_NOWAIT about page lock rather than the allocation context?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ