lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:45:51 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, keescook@...omium.org, msys.mizuma@...il.com,
        indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/6] x86/boot: Introduce kstrtoull() to boot
 directory instead of simple_strtoull()

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:27:28AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
> Oops, I thought you agree with what Baoquan said, so I send the new version
> and use simple_strtoull() back.

I could've misunderstood him. Lemme repeat what I mean:

- we should make kstrtoull() work because it is the right function to
use. Which means, include this too:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181216203113.GA23823@zn.tnic

- we should gradually start replacing simple_strtoull() in
arch/x86/boot/ and eventually get rid of it. But that's for the TODO
list, to take care of later.

- Take our time and stop with the hurrying and do the whole thing nice
and clean.

Ok?

Or have I forgotten something?

If not, I'll continue looking at your v13.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ