Message-ID: <20181217173106.GB12491@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:31:06 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Dr. Greg" <greg@...ellic.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
        "Ayoun, Serge" <serge.ayoun@...el.com>, shay.katz-zamir@...el.com,
        haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@...el.com>, mark.shanahan@...el.com,
        Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jethro@...tanix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 18/23] platform/x86: Intel SGX driver

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:39:28PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:28:59PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 04:06:27PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > [  504.149548] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > [  504.149550] kernel BUG at /home/sean/go/src/kernel.org/linux/mm/mmap.c:669!
> > > > [  504.150288] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > > > [  504.150614] CPU: 2 PID: 237 Comm: kworker/u20:2 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc2+ #267
> > > > [  504.151165] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> > > > [  504.151818] Workqueue: sgx-encl-wq sgx_encl_release_worker
> > > > [  504.152267] RIP: 0010:__vma_adjust+0x64a/0x820
> > > > [  504.152626] Code: ff 48 89 50 18 e9 6f fc ff ff 4c 8b ab 88 00 00 00 45 31 e4 e9 61 fb ff ff 31 c0 48 83 c4 60 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 <0f> 0b 49 89 de 49 83 c6 20 0f 84 06 fe ff ff 49 8d 7e e0 e8 fe ee
> > > > [  504.154109] RSP: 0000:ffffc900004ebd60 EFLAGS: 00010206
> > > > [  504.154535] RAX: 00007fd92ef7e000 RBX: ffff888467af16c0 RCX: ffff888467af16e0
> > > > [  504.155104] RDX: ffff888458fd09e0 RSI: 00007fd954021000 RDI: ffff88846bf9e798
> > > > [  504.155673] RBP: ffff888467af1480 R08: ffff88845bea2000 R09: 0000000000000000
> > > > [  504.156242] R10: 0000000080000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: 0000000000000000
> > > > [  504.156810] R13: ffff88846bf9e790 R14: ffff888467af1b70 R15: ffff888467af1b60
> > > > [  504.157378] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88846f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > > [  504.158021] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > > [  504.158483] CR2: 00007f2c56e99000 CR3: 0000000005009001 CR4: 0000000000360ee0
> > > > [  504.159054] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > > > [  504.159623] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > > > [  504.160193] Call Trace:
> > > > [  504.160406]  __split_vma+0x16f/0x180
> > > > [  504.160706]  ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> > > > [  504.161024]  __do_munmap+0xfb/0x450
> > > > [  504.161308]  sgx_encl_release_worker+0x44/0x70
> > > > [  504.161675]  process_one_work+0x200/0x3f0
> > > > [  504.162004]  worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0
> > > > [  504.162301]  ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0
> > > > [  504.162645]  kthread+0x113/0x130
> > > > [  504.162912]  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
> > > > [  504.163209]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> > > > [  504.163503] Modules linked in: bridge stp llc
> > > > [  504.163866] ---[ end trace 83076139fc25e3e0 ]---
> > > 
> > > There was a race with release and swapping code that I thought I fixed,
> > > and this is looks like a race there. Have to recheck what I did not
> > > consider. Anyway, though to share this if you have time to look at it.
> > > That is the part where something is now unsync most probably.
> > 
> > I think I found it. I was careless to make sgx_encl_release() to use
> > sgx_invalidate(), which does not delete pages in the case when enclave
> > is already marked as dead. This was after I had fixed the race that I
> > had there in the first place. That is why I was puzzled why it suddenly
> > reappeared.
> > 
> > Would be nice to use sgx_invalidate() also in release for consistency in
> > semantics sake so maybe just delete this:
> > 
> > 	if (encl->flags & SGX_ENCL_DEAD)
> > 		return;

This doesn't work as-is.  sgx_encl_release() needs to use sgx_free_page()
and not __sgx_free_page() so that we get a WARN() if the page can't be
freed.  sgx_invalidate() needs to use __sgx_free_page() as freeing a page
can fail due to running concurrently with reclaim.  I'll play around with
the code a bit, there's probably a fairly clean way to share code between
the two flows.

> 
> Updated master, not at this point next.

Still broken (as Greg's parallel email points out).

sgx_encl_release_worker() calls do_unmap() without checking the validity
of the page tables[1].  As is, the code doesn't even guarantee mm_struct
itself is valid.

The easiest fix I can think of is to add a SGX_ENCL_MM_RELEASED flag
that is set along with SGX_ENCL_DEAD in sgx_mmu_notifier_release(), and
only call do_unmap() if SGX_ENCL_MM_RELEASED is false.  Note that this
means we cant unregister the mmu_notifier until after do_unmap(), but
that's true no matter what since we're relying on the mmu_notifier to
hold a reference to mm_struct.  Patch attached.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg186827.html

View attachment "0001-x86-sgx-Do-not-attempt-to-unmap-enclave-VMAs-if-mm_s.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (3047 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists