[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1545078558.10804.19.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:29:18 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: ebiggers@...nel.org, James Morris James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] KEYS: fix parsing invalid pkey info string
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 12:02 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Talking about the conflicting ones: Opt_hash checks that
> Opt_policydigest isn't set. But Opt_policydigest doesn't check that
> Opt_hash isn't set, so you can mix the two if you just do it in the
> right order.
>
> But that's a separate bug, and doesn't seem to be a huge deal.
>
> But it *is* an example of how bogus all of this stuff is. Clearly
> people weren't really paying attention when writing any of this code.
A file signature is more restrictive than just a file hash. I'll clean
up this and the other ugliness.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists