[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e32c4c71-b88a-833a-9c6d-468bf0d8b512@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 20:27:26 +0100
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/9] x86/alternative: Batch of patch operations
On 12/18/18 6:31 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:46:36 +0100
> Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> +void text_poke_bp_batch(struct text_to_poke *tp, unsigned int nr_entries)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int i;
>> + unsigned char int3 = 0xcc;
>> + int patched_all_but_first = 0;
>> +
>> + bp_int3_tpv = tp;
>> + bp_int3_tpv_nr = nr_entries;
>> + bp_patching_in_progress = true;
>> + /*
>> + * Corresponding read barrier in int3 notifier for making sure the
>> + * in_progress and handler are correctly ordered wrt. patching.
>> + */
>> + smp_wmb();
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++)
>> + text_poke_bp_set_handler(tp[i].addr, tp[i].handler, int3);
>> +
>> + on_each_cpu(do_sync_core, NULL, 1);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) {
>> + if (tp->len - sizeof(int3) > 0) {
> Should this be:
>
> if (tp[i].len - sizeof(int3) > 0) {
>
> ?
Ops! Missed that... you are right.
Fixing in the v3.
Thanks!
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists