[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181218125453.4c5e6c056d31ccaa3a73d4a5@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:54:53 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Mark Brand <markbrand@...gle.com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
Vishwath Mohan <vishwath@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm] kasan, arm64: use ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN instead of
manual aligning
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:30:33 +0100 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
> Instead of changing cache->align to be aligned to KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE
> in kasan_cache_create() we can reuse the ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN macro.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kasan.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kasan.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@
> #define KASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET (KASAN_SHADOW_END - (1ULL << \
> (64 - KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)))
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
> +#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN (1ULL << KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SHIFT)
> +#endif
> +
> void kasan_init(void);
> void kasan_copy_shadow(pgd_t *pgdir);
> asmlinkage void kasan_early_init(void);
This looks unreliable. include/linux/slab.h has
/*
* Setting ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN in arch headers allows a different alignment.
* Intended for arches that get misalignment faults even for 64 bit integer
* aligned buffers.
*/
#ifndef ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
#endif
so if a .c file includes arch/arm64/include/asm/kasan.h after
include/linux/slab.h, it can get a macro-redefined warning. If the .c
file includes those headers in the other order, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN will
get a different value compared to other .c files.
Or something like that.
Different architectures define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN in different place:
./arch/microblaze/include/asm/page.h:#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
./arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h:#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 8
./arch/sh/include/asm/page.h:#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN 8
./arch/c6x/include/asm/cache.h:#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
./arch/sparc/include/asm/cache.h:#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
./arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h:#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN STACK_ALIGN
which is rather bad of us.
But still. I think your definition should occur in an arch header file
which is reliably included from slab.h. And kasan code should get its
definition of ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN by including slab.h.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists