[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJb24ZpM7qQfy_F7RUVEGyceBAXOndbZcTMh3a__k38UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:10:43 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: imx6: Add support for i.MX8MQ
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM Leonard Crestez
<leonard.crestez@....com> wrote:
>
> On 12/18/2018 5:15 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:07:02PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> >> Add code needed to support i.MX8MQ variant.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
>
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt
> >>
> >> +Additional required properties for imx8mq-pcie:
> >> +- fsl,controller-id: Logical ID of a given PCIE controller. PCIE1 is 0, PCIE2 is 1;
> >> +
> >
> > Remove this.
> >
> > If GPR register offset is what you need, then put that into DT.
> > Typically, we'd have a property with iomuxc phandle and offset.
>
> This series initially added explicit offsets but I suggested a single
> "controller-id" because:
> * There are multiple bit and byte offsets
> * Other imx8 SOCs also have 2x pcie with other bit/byte offsets
>
> Hiding this behind a compatible string and single "controller-id" seem
> preferable to elaborating register maps in dt bindings. It also makes
> upgrades simpler: if features are added which use other bits there is no
> need to describe them in DT and deal with compatibility headaches.
You already have an id for the controllers: the address. Use that if
you don't want to put the register offsets in DT.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists