| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20181218075538.GA3590@osiris>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:55:38 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-next] lots of messages due to "mm, memory_hotplug: be more
verbose for memory offline failures"
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:39:49PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 17-12-18 17:03:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 17-12-18 16:59:22, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > Hi Michal,
> > >
> > > with linux-next as of today on s390 I see tons of messages like
> > >
> > > [ 20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
> > > [ 20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
> > > [ 20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head)
> > > [ 20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600
> > > [ 20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
> > > [ 20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages
> > > [ 20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0
> > > [ 20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000()
> > > [ 20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000
> > > [ 20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000
> > >
> > > bisect points to b323c049a999 ("mm, memory_hotplug: be more verbose for memory offline failures")
> > > which is the first commit with which the messages appear.
> >
> > I would bet this is CMA allocator. How much is tons? Maybe we want a
> > rate limit or the other user is not really interested in them at all?
Yes, the system in question has a 4NB CMA area. "tons" translates to several hundred.
> In other words, this should silence those messages.
Yes, with the patch below applied the messages don't appear anymore.
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> index 4ae347cbc36d..4eb26d278046 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#define SKIP_HWPOISON 0x1
> +#define REPORT_FAILURE 0x2
> +
> bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> - int migratetype, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages);
> + int migratetype, int flags);
> void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype);
> int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> int migratetype, int *num_movable);
> @@ -44,10 +47,14 @@ int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> * For isolating all pages in the range finally, the caller have to
> * free all pages in the range. test_page_isolated() can be used for
> * test it.
> + *
> + * The following flags are allowed (they can be combined in a bit mask)
> + * SKIP_HWPOISON - ignore hwpoison pages
> + * REPORT_FAILURE - report details about the failure to isolate the range
> */
> int
> start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> - unsigned migratetype, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages);
> + unsigned migratetype, int flags);
>
> /*
> * Changes MIGRATE_ISOLATE to MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index c82193db4be6..8537429d33a6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(struct page *page)
> if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn))
> return false;
>
> - return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE, true);
> + return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE, SKIP_HWPOISON);
> }
>
> /* Checks if this range of memory is likely to be hot-removable. */
> @@ -1577,7 +1577,8 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>
> /* set above range as isolated */
> ret = start_isolate_page_range(start_pfn, end_pfn,
> - MIGRATE_MOVABLE, true);
> + MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
> + SKIP_HWPOISON | REPORT_FAILURE);
> if (ret) {
> mem_hotplug_done();
> reason = "failure to isolate range";
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index ec2c7916dc2d..ee4043419791 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7754,8 +7754,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
> * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
> */
> bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> - int migratetype,
> - bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages)
> + int migratetype, int flags)
> {
> unsigned long pfn, iter, found;
>
> @@ -7818,7 +7817,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> * The HWPoisoned page may be not in buddy system, and
> * page_count() is not 0.
> */
> - if (skip_hwpoisoned_pages && PageHWPoison(page))
> + if ((flags & SKIP_HWPOISON) && PageHWPoison(page))
> continue;
>
> if (__PageMovable(page))
> @@ -7845,7 +7844,8 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
> return false;
> unmovable:
> WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE);
> - dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "unmovable page");
> + if (flags & REPORT_FAILURE)
> + dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn+iter), "unmovable page");
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -7972,8 +7972,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> */
>
> ret = start_isolate_page_range(pfn_max_align_down(start),
> - pfn_max_align_up(end), migratetype,
> - false);
> + pfn_max_align_up(end), migratetype, 0);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index 43e085608846..ce323e56b34d 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/page_isolation.h>
>
> -static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype,
> - bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages)
> +static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_flags)
> {
> struct zone *zone;
> unsigned long flags, pfn;
> @@ -60,8 +59,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype,
> * FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself.
> * We just check MOVABLE pages.
> */
> - if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, arg.pages_found, migratetype,
> - skip_hwpoisoned_pages))
> + if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, arg.pages_found, migratetype, flags))
> ret = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -185,7 +183,7 @@ __first_valid_page(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> * prevents two threads from simultaneously working on overlapping ranges.
> */
> int start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> - unsigned migratetype, bool skip_hwpoisoned_pages)
> + unsigned migratetype, int flags)
> {
> unsigned long pfn;
> unsigned long undo_pfn;
> @@ -199,7 +197,7 @@ int start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
> page = __first_valid_page(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages);
> if (page &&
> - set_migratetype_isolate(page, migratetype, skip_hwpoisoned_pages)) {
> + set_migratetype_isolate(page, migratetype, flags)) {
> undo_pfn = pfn;
> goto undo;
> }
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists