linux-kernel - Re: [RFT][PATCH 0/2] ACPI / PM: Avoid spurious wakeups from non-wakeup GPEs in suspend-to-idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:50:07 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 0/2] ACPI / PM: Avoid spurious wakeups from
 non-wakeup GPEs in suspend-to-idle

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 5:50 PM Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:19:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi All,
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> > It turns out that on some systems non-wakeup GPEs cause trouble (see the
> > changelog of patch [1/2]), so they better should be disabled during
> > suspend-to-idle (at least before entering the main loop of it).  This
> > is done in patch [1/2].
> >
> > Patch [2/2] is just a folllow-up.
>
> I tested both patches on Lenovo Carbon X1 6th generation and one new
> Dell system. Both default to s2idle. I did not see any issues around
> s2idle with the two patches applied.
>
> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>

Thank you!