[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181218011346.GA26211@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:13:47 +0200
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing MIPS delay slot emulation weakness?
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:55:28AM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> As to actual implementations I believe all the Cavium Octeon line CPUs
> (David, please correct me if I am wrong) have no FPU and they have vendor
> extensions beyond the base ISA + ASE instruction set. Arguably you could
> say that their additional instructions should not be scheduled into FPU
> branch delay slots then, however the toolchain will happily do that, as I
> wrote before.
Octeon III added/introduced FPU.
A.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists