[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181218111431.7vr7rhvr5t7xb5i2@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:14:31 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: zhe.he@...driver.com
Cc: acme@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Avoid unnecessary reallocations of
memory allocated in cpu hotplug prepare state
On 2018-12-18 18:30:33 [+0800], zhe.he@...driver.com wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3398,13 +3398,16 @@ ssize_t intel_event_sysfs_show(char *page, u64 config)
> return x86_event_sysfs_show(page, config, event);
> }
>
> -struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
> +void allocate_shared_regs(struct intel_shared_regs **pregs, int cpu)
> {
> - struct intel_shared_regs *regs;
> + struct intel_shared_regs *regs = *pregs;
> int i;
>
> - regs = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_shared_regs),
> - GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> + if (regs)
> + memset(regs, 0, sizeof(struct intel_shared_regs));
> + else
> + regs = *pregs = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_shared_regs),
> + GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> if (regs) {
> /*
> * initialize the locks to keep lockdep happy
void allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
struct intel_shared_regs *regs = puc->shared_regs;
int i;
if (!regs)
regs = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_shared_regs),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
if (!regs)
return;
memset(regs, 0, sizeof(struct intel_shared_regs));
for (i = 0; i < EXTRA_REG_MAX; i++)
raw_spin_lock_init(®s->regs[i].lock);
return regs;
}
> @@ -3414,20 +3417,21 @@ struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
>
> regs->core_id = -1;
> }
> - return regs;
> }
>
> -static struct intel_excl_cntrs *allocate_excl_cntrs(int cpu)
> +static void allocate_excl_cntrs(struct intel_excl_cntrs **pc, int cpu)
> {
> - struct intel_excl_cntrs *c;
> + struct intel_excl_cntrs *c = *pc;
>
> - c = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_excl_cntrs),
> - GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> + if (c)
> + memset(c, 0, sizeof(struct intel_excl_cntrs));
> + else
> + c = *pc = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_excl_cntrs),
> + GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
> if (c) {
> raw_spin_lock_init(&c->lock);
> c->core_id = -1;
> }
> - return c;
> }
static void allocate_excl_cntrs(int cpu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
struct intel_excl_cntrs *c = cpuc->excl_cntrs;
if (!c)
c = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct intel_excl_cntrs),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
if (!c)
return;
memset(c, 0, sizeof(struct intel_excl_cntrs));
raw_spin_lock_init(&c->lock);
c->core_id = -1;
cpuc->excl_cntrs = c;
}
> static void intel_pmu_cpu_dying(int cpu)
> {
> - struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> - struct intel_shared_regs *pc;
> -
> - pc = cpuc->shared_regs;
> - if (pc) {
> - if (pc->core_id == -1 || --pc->refcnt == 0)
I think ->refcnt member can go, too. It is only incremented now for no
reason now.
> - kfree(pc);
> - cpuc->shared_regs = NULL;
> - }
> -
> - free_excl_cntrs(cpu);
> -
> fini_debug_store_on_cpu(cpu);
>
> if (x86_pmu.counter_freezing)
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists