[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181217204124-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:41:36 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: gchen chen <gchen.guomin@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
gchen <guominchen@...cent.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export mm_update_next_owner function for vhost-net
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:39:16AM +0800, gchen chen wrote:
> Yes, I think so.
> and i think the point is that unuse_mm() can't directly set tsk->mm=NULL.
So why can't unuse_mm call mm_update_next_owner?
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists