[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181218022319.GA5693@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:23:19 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] debugobjects: Move printk out of db lock critical
sections
On (12/17/18 19:17), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> This makes me sad - whatever happened to the principle of keeping printk
> simple?
printk() is still simple. Console drivers are not, tho.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists