[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181218140714.GC24278@latitude>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:07:14 +0100
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] powerpc/mm/32s: rework mmu_mapin_ram()
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:18:42AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> The only difference I see then are the flags. Everything else is seems
> identical.
>
> I know you tried already, but would you mind trying once more with the
> following change ?
>
[...]
> - setbat(idx, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT);
> + setbat(idx, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_X);
Good call, with this workaround on top of patches 1-3, it boots again:
# mount -t debugfs d /sys/kernel/debug
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/powerpc/block_address_translation
---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]---
0: 0xc0000000-0xc0ffffff 0x00000000 Kernel EXEC
1: -
2: 0xc1000000-0xc17fffff 0x01000000 Kernel EXEC
3: -
4: 0xd0000000-0xd1ffffff 0x10000000 Kernel EXEC
5: -
6: -
7: -
---[ Data Block Address Translation ]---
0: 0xc0000000-0xc0ffffff 0x00000000 Kernel RW
1: 0xfffe0000-0xffffffff 0x0d000000 Kernel RW no cache guarded
2: 0xc1000000-0xc17fffff 0x01000000 Kernel RW
3: -
4: 0xd0000000-0xd1ffffff 0x10000000 Kernel RW
5: -
6: -
7: -
> I think we may have some code trying to modify the kernel text without using
> code patching functions.
Is there any faster way than to sprinkle some printks in setup_kernel
and try to find the guilty piece of code this way?
Jonathan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists