linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 6/6] ACPI/IORT: Stub out ACS functions when CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <80c186fe-e5ff-1d13-fad5-6386b21b45c4@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:46:17 +0100
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
To:     Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/6] ACPI/IORT: Stub out ACS functions when CONFIG_PCI
 is not set

On 12/18/2018 3:14 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> I prefer stub function for iort_enable_acs(), not adding #ifdef/#endif pair inside
> this function.

Yes, I'm reworking this per input from Lorenzo.

> 
> By the way, there are other pci function called in iort.c, could you explain a
> little bit why no need to update other function calls in commit message?

I added few words about why other code was not stubbed out.