[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62997df2-0817-b54d-b11e-00a567f1d67c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:11:39 +0800
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks
On 2018/12/18 22:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Aubrey Li wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
>> index a38bf5a1e37a..8778ac172255 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h
>> @@ -411,6 +411,13 @@ static inline int copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(struct fpu *fpu)
>> {
>> if (likely(use_xsave())) {
>> copy_xregs_to_kernel(&fpu->state.xsave);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * AVX512 state is tracked here because its use is
>> + * known to slow the max clock speed of the core.
>> + */
>> + if (fpu->state.xsave.header.xfeatures & XFEATURE_MASK_AVX512)
>> + fpu->avx512_timestamp = jiffies_64;
>
> Even if unlikely this is incorrect when running a 32 bit kernel because
> there jiffies_64 cannot be atomically loaded vs. a concurrent update. See
> the comment in include/linux/jiffies.h right above the jiffies_64
> declaration.
>
Yeah, I noticed this, because this is under use_xsave() condition, also need
valid AVX512 state, so a 32 bit kernel won't enter this branch.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists