lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181218163928.831329181@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:39:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Piotr Jaroszynski <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 11/44] fs/iomap.c: get/put the page in iomap_page_create/release()

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Piotr Jaroszynski <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>

commit 61c6de667263184125d5ca75e894fcad632b0dd3 upstream.

migrate_page_move_mapping() expects pages with private data set to have
a page_count elevated by 1.  This is what used to happen for xfs through
the buffer_heads code before the switch to iomap in commit 82cb14175e7d
("xfs: add support for sub-pagesize writeback without buffer_heads").
Not having the count elevated causes move_pages() to fail on memory
mapped files coming from xfs.

Make iomap compatible with the migrate_page_move_mapping() assumption by
elevating the page count as part of iomap_page_create() and lowering it
in iomap_page_release().

It causes the move_pages() syscall to misbehave on memory mapped files
from xfs.  It does not not move any pages, which I suppose is "just" a
perf issue, but it also ends up returning a positive number which is out
of spec for the syscall.  Talking to Michal Hocko, it sounds like
returning positive numbers might be a necessary update to move_pages()
anyway though
(https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181116114955.GJ14706@dhcp22.suse.cz).

I only hit this in tests that verify that move_pages() actually moved
the pages.  The test also got confused by the positive return from
move_pages() (it got treated as a success as positive numbers were not
expected and not handled) making it a bit harder to track down what's
going on.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181115184140.1388751-1-pjaroszynski@nvidia.com
Fixes: 82cb14175e7d ("xfs: add support for sub-pagesize writeback without buffer_heads")
Signed-off-by: Piotr Jaroszynski <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/iomap.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/iomap.c
+++ b/fs/iomap.c
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ iomap_page_create(struct inode *inode, s
 	atomic_set(&iop->read_count, 0);
 	atomic_set(&iop->write_count, 0);
 	bitmap_zero(iop->uptodate, PAGE_SIZE / SECTOR_SIZE);
+
+	/*
+	 * migrate_page_move_mapping() assumes that pages with private data have
+	 * their count elevated by 1.
+	 */
+	get_page(page);
 	set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)iop);
 	SetPagePrivate(page);
 	return iop;
@@ -133,6 +139,7 @@ iomap_page_release(struct page *page)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&iop->write_count));
 	ClearPagePrivate(page);
 	set_page_private(page, 0);
+	put_page(page);
 	kfree(iop);
 }
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ