linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] media: usb: pwc: Don't use coherent DMA buffers for ISO transfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181219075150.GA26656@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:51:50 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@....msu.ru>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.kornilov@...il.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>, hdegoede@...hat.com,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        Mike Isely <isely@...ox.com>,
        Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
        keiichiw@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] media: usb: pwc: Don't use coherent DMA buffers
 for ISO transfer

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 06:48:03PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > So as I said you can call dma_alloc_attrs with DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT
> > in a loop with a suitably small chunk size, then stuff the results into
> > a scatterlist and map that again for the device share with if you don't
> > want a single contigous region.  You just have to either deal with
> > non-contigous access from the kernel or use vmap and the right vmap
> > cache flushing helpers.
> 
> The point is that you didn't have to do this small chunk loop without
> DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT, so it's at least inconsistent now and not
> sure why it could be better than just a loop of alloc_page().

You have to do it if you want to map the addresses for a second device.

> > I would advice against new non-consistent users until this series
> > goes through, mostly because dma_cache_sync is such an amazing bad
> > API.  Otherwise things will just work at the allocation side, you'll
> > just need to be careful to transfer ownership between the cpu and
> > the device(s) carefully using the dma_sync_* APIs.
> 
> Just to clarify, the actual code isn't very likely to surface any time
> soon. so I assume it would be after this series lands.
> 
> We will however need an API that can transparently handle both cases
> of contiguous (without IOMMU) and page-by-page allocations (with
> IOMMU) behind the scenes, like the current dma_alloc_attrs() without
> DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT.

Is the use case to then share the memory between multiples devices
or just for a single device?  The latter case is generally easy, the
former is rather more painful.