linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] trace nvme submit queue status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG3TDc3QarHcz_ez=GYYzqDp8VwMHL=nUTvur+5XN+m5-T57sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:19:00 -0800
From:   peng yu <yupeng0921@...il.com>
To:     "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
Cc:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
        "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "jthumshirn@...e.de" <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] trace nvme submit queue status

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:47 AM hch@....de <hch@....de> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 2477bd906904..5a0bf6a24d50 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -1004,8 +1004,7 @@ static inline void nvme_handle_cqe(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 idx)
>         }
>
>         req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(*nvmeq->tags, cqe->command_id);
> -       trace_nvme_sq(req->rq_disk, nvmeq->qid, le16_to_cpu(cqe->sq_head),
> -                       nvmeq->sq_tail);
> +       trace_nvme_sq(req, cqe->sq_head, nvmeq->sq_tail);
>         nvme_end_request(req, cqe->status, cqe->result);
>  }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/trace.h b/drivers/nvme/host/trace.h
> index cf666709bc50..3564120aa7b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/trace.h
> @@ -185,22 +185,24 @@ TRACE_EVENT(nvme_async_event,
>  #undef aer_name
>
>  TRACE_EVENT(nvme_sq,
> -       TP_PROTO(void *rq_disk, int qid, int sq_head, int sq_tail),
> -       TP_ARGS(rq_disk, qid, sq_head, sq_tail),
> +       TP_PROTO(struct request *req, __le16 sq_head, int sq_tail),
> +       TP_ARGS(req, sq_head, sq_tail),
>         TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +               __field(int, ctrl_id)
>                 __array(char, disk, DISK_NAME_LEN)
>                 __field(int, qid)
> -               __field(int, sq_head)
> -               __field(int, sq_tail)
> +               __field(u16, sq_head)
> +               __field(u16, sq_tail)
>         ),
>         TP_fast_assign(
> -               __assign_disk_name(__entry->disk, rq_disk);
> -               __entry->qid = qid;
> -               __entry->sq_head = sq_head;
> +               __entry->ctrl_id = nvme_req(req)->ctrl->instance;
> +               __assign_disk_name(__entry->disk, req->rq_disk);
> +               __entry->qid = nvme_req_qid(req);
> +               __entry->sq_head = le16_to_cpu(sq_head);
>                 __entry->sq_tail = sq_tail;
>         ),
> -       TP_printk("nvme: %s qid=%d head=%d tail=%d",
> -               __print_disk_name(__entry->disk),
> +       TP_printk("nvme%d: %sqid=%d, head=%u, tail=%u",
> +               __entry->ctrl_id, __print_disk_name(__entry->disk),
>                 __entry->qid, __entry->sq_head, __entry->sq_tail
>         )
>  );

I think this change is nice. Will you submit this change or are you
suggesting me to do it?