lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181219091742.GA16508@imbe.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:17:42 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] mfd: wm8400-core: Make it explicitly non-modular

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:31:28PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> 
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8400
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:    bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM8400"
> 
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> 
> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
> 
> Since module_init was not in use by this code, the init ordering
> remains unchanged with this commit.
> 
> A trivial function rename from wm8400_module_init to the name
> wm8400_driver_init is also done to reduce possible confusion.
> 
> Also note that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is a no-op for non-modular code.
> 
> We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
> is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
> 
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, wm8400_i2c_id);
>  
>  static struct i2c_driver wm8400_i2c_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
> @@ -161,7 +160,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver wm8400_i2c_driver = {
>  };
>  #endif

Do we not want to add suppress_bind_attrs into the i2c_driver
struct here?

Thanks,
Charles

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ