Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:56:37 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "anemo@....ocn.ne.jp" <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
        "paul.burton@...s.com" <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        "jhogan@...nel.org" <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: NFS/TCP crashes on MIPS/RBTX4927 in v4.20-rcX (bisected)

Any comments from the iovec experts?
This is a regression in v4.20-rc1.

Thanks!

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:01 PM Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 19:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > (For the newly added CCs, first message was
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdVJr0PwvJg3FeTCy7vxuyY1=S1tPLHO7hPsoZX4wZ+-cQ@mail.gmail.com/)
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:51 PM Trond Myklebust <
> > > trondmy@...merspace.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 15:03 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:47 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <
> > > > > geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:45 PM Trond Myklebust <
> > > > > > trondmy@...merspace.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 14:41 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM Atsushi Nemoto <
> > > > > > > > anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:53:07 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven <
> > > > > > > > > geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I found similar crashes in a report from 2006, but of
> > > > > > > > > > course the
> > > > > > > > > > code
> > > > > > > > > > has changed too much to apply the solution proposed
> > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > (
> > > > > > > > > > https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2006-09/msg00169.html
> > > > > > > > > > ).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Userland is Debian 8 (the last release supporting
> > > > > > > > > > "old"
> > > > > > > > > > MIPS).
> > > > > > > > > > My kernel is based on v4.20.0-rc5, but the issue
> > > > > > > > > > happens
> > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > v4.20-rc1,
> > > > > > > > > > too.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > However, I noticed it works in v4.19! Hence I've
> > > > > > > > > > bisected
> > > > > > > > > > this,
> > > > > > > > > > to commit
> > > > > > > > > > 277e4ab7d530bf28 ("SUNRPC: Simplify TCP receive code
> > > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > switching
> > > > > > > > > > to using
> > > > > > > > > > iterators").
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dropping the ",tcp" part from the nfsroot parameter
> > > > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > fixes
> > > > > > > > > > the issue.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Given RBTX4927 is little endian, just like my
> > > > > > > > > > arm/arm64
> > > > > > > > > > boards,
> > > > > > > > > > it's probably
> > > > > > > > > > not an endianness issue.  Sparse didn't show anything
> > > > > > > > > > suspicious
> > > > > > > > > > before/after
> > > > > > > > > > the guilty commit.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Do you have a clue?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If it was a cache issue, disabling i-cache or d-cache
> > > > > > > > > completely
> > > > > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > > help understanding the problem.  I added TXx9 specific
> > > > > > > > > "icdisable"
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > "dcdisable" kernel options for debugging long ago.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I hope these options still works correctly with recent
> > > > > > > > > kernel
> > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > sure.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Also, disabling i-cache makes your board VERY slow, of
> > > > > > > > > course.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > When using these options, I do see a slowdown in early
> > > > > > > > boot,
> > > > > > > > but the
> > > > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > is still there.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My next guess is an unaligned access not using
> > > > > > > > {get,put}_unaligned(),
> > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > doesn't seem to work on tx4927, but doesn't cause an
> > > > > > > > exception
> > > > > > > > neither.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can you try my linux-next branch on git.linux-nfs.org? It
> > > > > > > contains a
> > > > > > > fixes for a hang that results from the above commit.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > git pull git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-
> > > > > > > nfs.git
> > > > > > > linux-next
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately it doesn't help.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the mean time, I tried your newer linux-next, no change.
> > > > > I tried several other things:
> > > > >   - remove the packed attribute (why did you add that?),
> > > >
> > > > The packed attribute allows us to avoid a series of copy
> > > > operations
> > > > when decoding the first three elements of a RPC over TCP header
> > > > (which
> > > > is why they are all declared as big endian). The alternative
> > > > would be
> > > > to have a 12 byte buffer there for temporary storage, and then a
> > > > duplicate set of 3 32-bit words into which we copy the buffer
> > > > contents
> > > > after extracting them from the (non-blocking) socket.
> > > >
> > > > >   - verify (at runtime) that all accesses to fraghdr, xid, and
> > > > > calldir
> > > > > are aligned,
> > > > >   - enable RPC_DEBUG_DATA, nothing fishy seen at first sight.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is anyone else seeing this on MIPS, or any other platform?
> > > > > Does mounting NFS with -o nfsvers=3,tcp work on other MIPS
> > > > > platforms?
> > > >
> > > > I have no access to any MIPS hardware for the purposes of testing
> > > > so
> > > > that would be a question for the community.
> > > >
> > > > One thing that I have noticed is that unlike the old code, the
> > > > bvec
> > > > 'generic' code does appear to fail to call flush_dcache_page().
> > > > Could
> > > > that be causing the problem here? If so, why would that not be a
> > > > problem in the context of regular block I/O?
> >
> > Thanks for the hint!
> >
> > It wasn't clear to me where exactly the old code called
> > flush_dcache_page(), but as rpcrdma_inline_fixup() calls it in
> > between
> > copying to a page, and unmapping the page, I added a call to
> > flush_dcache_page() to all functions in lib/iov_iter.c that map a
> > page
> > and copy to it, cfr. the patch below.
> >
> > And suddenly NFS root over TCP is working again!
>
> Hah!
>
> >
> > Note that I have no idea if it affects regular block I/O, as my
> > RBTX4927
> > does not have block devices.
> >
> > Also note that this platform does not use highmem.
> >
> > So, where's the proper place to fix this?
> > Thanks in advance!
>
> Given that one of the main use cases for iov_iter is the page cache, I
> think that your patch below is the correct one. However perhaps Al can
> comment?
>
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
> > index 54c248526b55fc49..5be62db33414d3f9 100644
> > --- a/lib/iov_iter.c
> > +++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
> > @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ static size_t copy_page_from_iter_iovec(struct
> > page *page, size_t offset, size_t
> >                       to += copy;
> >                       bytes -= copy;
> >               }
> > +             flush_dcache_page(page);
> >               if (likely(!bytes)) {
> >                       kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> >                       goto done;
> > @@ -463,6 +464,7 @@ static void memcpy_to_page(struct page *page,
> > size_t offset, const char *from, s
> >  {
> >       char *to = kmap_atomic(page);
> >       memcpy(to + offset, from, len);
> > +     flush_dcache_page(page);
> >       kunmap_atomic(to);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -470,6 +472,7 @@ static void memzero_page(struct page *page,
> > size_t offset, size_t len)
> >  {
> >       char *addr = kmap_atomic(page);
> >       memset(addr + offset, 0, len);
> > +     flush_dcache_page(page);
> >       kunmap_atomic(addr);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -580,6 +583,7 @@ static size_t csum_and_copy_to_pipe_iter(const
> > void *addr, size_t bytes,
> >               char *p = kmap_atomic(pipe->bufs[idx].page);
> >               next = csum_partial_copy_nocheck(addr, p + r, chunk,
> > 0);
> >               sum = csum_block_add(sum, next, off);
> > +             flush_dcache_page(pipe->bufs[idx].page);
> >               kunmap_atomic(p);
> >               i->idx = idx;
> >               i->iov_offset = r + chunk;
> > @@ -628,6 +632,7 @@ static unsigned long memcpy_mcsafe_to_page(struct
> > page *page, size_t offset,
> >
> >       to = kmap_atomic(page);
> >       ret = memcpy_mcsafe(to + offset, from, len);
> > +     flush_dcache_page(page);
> >       kunmap_atomic(to);
> >
> >       return ret;
> > @@ -894,6 +899,7 @@ size_t copy_page_from_iter(struct page *page,
> > size_t offset, size_t bytes,
> >       if (i->type & (ITER_BVEC|ITER_KVEC)) {
> >               void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
> >               size_t wanted = _copy_from_iter(kaddr + offset, bytes,
> > i);
> > +             flush_dcache_page(page);
> >               kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> >               return wanted;
> >       } else
> > @@ -958,6 +964,7 @@ size_t iov_iter_copy_from_user_atomic(struct page
> > *page,
> >                                v.bv_offset, v.bv_len),
> >               memcpy((p += v.iov_len) - v.iov_len, v.iov_base,
> > v.iov_len)
> >       )
> > +     flush_dcache_page(page);
> >       kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
> >       return bytes;
> >  }
> > @@ -1494,6 +1501,7 @@ size_t csum_and_copy_to_iter(const void *addr,
> > size_t bytes, __wsum *csum,
> >               next = csum_partial_copy_nocheck((from += v.bv_len) -
> > v.bv_len,
> >                                                p + v.bv_offset,
> >                                                v.bv_len, 0);
> > +             flush_dcache_page(v.bv_page);
> >               kunmap_atomic(p);
> >               sum = csum_block_add(sum, next, off);
> >               off += v.bv_len;

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists