[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e694ddf-f315-ed74-8f0b-c5edce48b4a5@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:14:48 +0100
From:   Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] x86/jump_label: Move checking code away from
 __jump_label_transform()
On 12/19/18 9:49 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
>>
>>> This patch creates a new functions 
>>
>> I am not a native speaker, but this doesn't sound like proper english to 
>> me.
> 
> Aside of that 'This patch' is wrong to begin with. See Documentation/process/
> 
I will address these errors in the next version.
Thanks.
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
