linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Make STM32 interrupt controller use hwspinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:00:23 +0100
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Make STM32 interrupt controller use hwspinlock

Hi Marc,

On 12/18/18 4:39 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 17/12/2018 14:22, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> This series allow to protect STM32 interrupt controller configuration registers
>> with a hwspinlock to avoid conflicting accesses between processors.
>>
>> version 3:
>> - with bindings patch
>>
>> version 2:
>> - rework hwspinlock locking sequence in stm32 irqchip to take care of the
>>    cases where hwspinlock node is disabled or not yet probed
>>
>> Benjamin Gaignard (3):
>>    dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: stm32: Document hwlock properties
>>    irqchip: stm32: protect configuration registers with hwspinlock
>>    ARM: dts: stm32: Add hwlock for irqchip on stm32mp157
>>
>>   .../interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt         |   4 +
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c.dtsi                 |   1 +
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c                   | 116 ++++++++++++++++++---
>>   3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> I've taken the first two patches. Please route the DTS patch to the
> appropriate tree.
> 

I'll take DTS patch in stm32-next branch.

Regards
Alex

> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
>