linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: fix rounding issue for asym packing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:05:59 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: fix rounding issue for asym packing

On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 15:59, Valentin Schneider
<valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/12/2018 13:39, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> [...]
> >> I used that setup out of convenience for myself, but AFAICT that use-case
> >> just stresses that issue.
> >
> > After looking at you UC in details, your problem comes from the wl=1
> > for cpu0 whereas there is no running task.
> > But wl!=0 without running task should not be possible since fdf5f3
> > ("wsched/fair: Disable LB_BIAS by default")
> >
> > This explain the 1023 instead of 1022
> >
> >
>
> True, I had a look at the trace and there doesn't seem to be any running
> task on that CPU. That's a separate matter however - the rounding issues
> can happen regardless of the wl values.

But it means that the rounding fix +1 works and your problems comes
from something else