lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181219153022.w5le6nf7meiogh72@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:30:22 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kmemleak: Turn kmemleak_lock to raw spinlock on RT

On 2018-12-18 15:07:45 [+0000], Catalin Marinas wrote:
…
> It may be worth running some performance/latency tests during kmemleak
> scanning (echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak) but at a quick look,
> I don't think we'd see any difference with a raw_spin_lock_t.
> 
> With a bit more thinking (though I'll be off until the new year), we
> could probably get rid of the kmemleak_lock entirely in scan_block() and
> make lookup_object() and the related rbtree code in kmemleak RCU-safe.

Okay. So let me apply that patch into my RT tree with your ack (from the
other email). And then I hope that it either shows up upstream or gets
replaced with RCU in the ende :)

Thanks.

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ