lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfHHNUzQZu62btspC+6SwgoGPdAzusfSixXM7U9u3QP7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:22:51 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>
Cc:     Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
        jy0922.shim@...sung.com, Seung Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        kyungmin.park@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: gpu: samsung-rotator: Document s5pv210 support

On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 17:04, Paweł Chmiel
<pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This commit documents new compatible for s5pv210 soc,
> which will be also supported by this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/samsung-rotator.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/samsung-rotator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/samsung-rotator.txt
> index 82cd1ed0be93..78658dec6941 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/samsung-rotator.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/samsung-rotator.txt
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Required properties:
>         (a) "samsung,exynos4210-rotator" for Rotator IP in Exynos4210
>         (b) "samsung,exynos4212-rotator" for Rotator IP in Exynos4212/4412
>         (c) "samsung,exynos5250-rotator" for Rotator IP in Exynos5250
> +       (d) "samsung,s5pv210-rotator" for Rotator IP in S5PV210

How about putting it at beginning as the oldest chipset? This would
require reordering the list so maybe let's remove the a/b/c list
enumerations? They are kind of useless.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ