linux-kernel - Applied "drivers/regulator: fix a missing check of return value" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181219174835.6929711259E9@debutante.sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:48:35 +0000 (GMT)
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "drivers/regulator: fix a missing check of return value" to the regulator tree

The patch

   drivers/regulator: fix a missing check of return value

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 966e927bf8cc6a44f8b72582a1d6d3ffc73b12ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 23:04:13 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/regulator: fix a missing check of return value

If palmas_smps_read() fails, we should not use the read data in "reg"
which may contain random value. The fix inserts a check for the return
value of palmas_smps_read(): If it fails, we return the error code
upstream and stop using "reg".

Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
index bb5ab7d78895..c2cc392a27d4 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
@@ -443,13 +443,16 @@ static int palmas_ldo_write(struct palmas *palmas, unsigned int reg,
 static int palmas_set_mode_smps(struct regulator_dev *dev, unsigned int mode)
 {
 	int id = rdev_get_id(dev);
+	int ret;
 	struct palmas_pmic *pmic = rdev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct palmas_pmic_driver_data *ddata = pmic->palmas->pmic_ddata;
 	struct palmas_regs_info *rinfo = &ddata->palmas_regs_info[id];
 	unsigned int reg;
 	bool rail_enable = true;

-	palmas_smps_read(pmic->palmas, rinfo->ctrl_addr, &reg);
+	ret = palmas_smps_read(pmic->palmas, rinfo->ctrl_addr, &reg);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;

 	reg &= ~PALMAS_SMPS12_CTRL_MODE_ACTIVE_MASK;

-- 
2.19.0.rc2