[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181219175231.GL8130@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:52:31 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
mazziesaccount@...il.com, heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com,
mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] regmap: regmap-irq/gpio-max77620: add level-irq
support
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 08:48:42AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> I forgot that the block of code the commit "regmap: regmap-irq: Remove
> default irq type setting from core" removes do use the old type specifiers
> whcih this patch changes. So even though this patch applies cleanly on tree
> which does not include "regmap: regmap-irq: Remove default irq type setting
> from core" - it does not mean there is no dependency. This was my brain fart.
> There is dependency. "regmap: regmap-irq: Remove default irq type setting
> from core" should be applied prior this patch.
> Should I combine these two patches as a series (and resend them) or what is
> the correct way to note the dependency?
It's fine as-is.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists