linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/41] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_els: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c3c167dc-5bfe-9673-6609-979be2951026@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:27:28 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/41] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_els: Mark expected switch
 fall-throughs

Hi,

Friendly ping:

Who can ack or review this patch, please?

Thanks
-- 
Gustavo

On 11/27/18 10:31 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114978 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
> index 5c34bfa624ef..1f20c35e0f84 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
> @@ -8649,6 +8649,7 @@ lpfc_cmpl_reg_new_vport(struct lpfc_hba *phba, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *pmb)
>   				lpfc_nlp_put(ndlp);
>   				return;
>   			}
> +			/* fall through */
>   
>   		default:
>   			/* Try to recover from this error */
>