lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:57:22 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive: add documentation for
 the SiFive FU540

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 09:21:49PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Add DT binding documentation for the SiFive FU540 SoC.  This
> SoC is documented at:
> 
> https://static.dev.sifive.com/FU540-C000-v1.0.pdf
> 
> This file is originally based on
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive/fu540.txt     | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                        |  9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive/fu540.txt

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

However, with 4.21 we're starting to use json-schema and top-level 
SoC/board bindings. Not requiring it yet, but feel free to convert to 
that if you want. Then we don't have to do it later.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ