linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/41] scsi: isci: remote_device: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84102f94-e8c7-ff71-455e-d35acab7a259@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 09:51:41 +0100
From:   Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        intel-linux-scu <intel-linux-scu@...el.com>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/41] scsi: isci: remote_device: Mark expected switch
 fall-throughs

On 11/28/18 5:30 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in
> order to separate the "fall through" annotations from the rest of
> the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>

Acked-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>