linux-kernel - Re: x86/sgx: uapi change proposal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181220124937.GA3753@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:49:37 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     jethro@...tanix.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com, greg@...ellic.com
Subject: Re: x86/sgx: uapi change proposal

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:08:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:26 AM Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2018-12-19 13:28, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > /**
> > >  * struct sgx_enclave_add_page - parameter structure for the
> > >  *                               %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGE ioctl
> > >  * @eclave_fd:        file handle to the enclave address space
> > >  * @src:      address for the page data
> > >  * @secinfo:  address for the SECINFO data
> > >  * @mrmask:   bitmask for the measured 256 byte chunks
> > >  */
> > > struct sgx_enclave_add_page {
> > >       __u64   enclave_fd;
> > >       __u64   src;
> > >       __u64   secinfo;
> > >       __u16   mrmask;
> > > } __attribute__((__packed__));
> >
> > Wouldn't you just pass enclave_fd as the ioctl fd parameter?
> >
> > How to specify the address of the page that is being added?
> 
> One more comment about the structure: I would generally recommend
> against packing structures like this. Instead just extend the mrmask
> member to 64 bits as well.

Can do. Thanks for the remark.

/Jarkko