linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: s390: remove prefix kvm_s390_gisa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <49e2b16f-23a3-73a8-75b1-b03d5c9ad8a2@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:37:01 +0100
From:   Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc:     KVM Mailing List <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: s390: remove prefix kvm_s390_gisa_ from
 static inline functions



On 20.12.18 13:24, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:17:47 +0100
> Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> This will shorten the length of code lines.
>> All GISA related static inline functions are local to interrupt.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index 4ab20d2eb180..9b1fa39b6f90 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> @@ -224,22 +224,22 @@ static inline u8 int_word_to_isc(u32 int_word)
>>    */
>>   #define IPM_BIT_OFFSET (offsetof(struct kvm_s390_gisa, ipm) * BITS_PER_BYTE)
>>   
>> -static inline void kvm_s390_gisa_set_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>> +static inline void set_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>>   {
>>   	set_bit_inv(IPM_BIT_OFFSET + gisc, (unsigned long *) gisa);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static inline u8 kvm_s390_gisa_get_ipm(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
>> +static inline u8 get_ipm(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
>>   {
>>   	return READ_ONCE(gisa->ipm);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static inline void kvm_s390_gisa_clear_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>> +static inline void clear_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>>   {
>>   	clear_bit_inv(IPM_BIT_OFFSET + gisc, (unsigned long *) gisa);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static inline int kvm_s390_gisa_tac_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>> +static inline int tac_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>>   {
>>   	return test_and_clear_bit_inv(IPM_BIT_OFFSET + gisc, (unsigned long *) gisa);
>>   }
> 
> I don't disagree with making them shorter, but I think the code would
> be more readable if you only dropped the kvm_s390_ prefix and kept
> annotating the functions as gisa_.

applied

>