[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a83c27d7-28e6-faef-9730-8276aa57b499@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:07:48 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/41] scsi: ppa: mark expected switch fall-through
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:33 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114988 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ppa.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ppa.c b/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
> index ee86a0c62dbf..d29999ba5458 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static int ppa_engine(ppa_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> }
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> }
> + /* fall through */
>
> case 2: /* Phase 2 - We are now talking to the scsi bus */
> if (!ppa_select(dev, scmd_id(cmd))) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists