[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181221003100.157581-1-dbasehore@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 16:31:00 -0800
From: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
To: mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Remove global clk traversal on fetch parent index
It's not required to traverse the entire clk tree when the parents
array contains a NULL value. You already have the parent clk_core
pointer, so you can just compare the parent->name and parent_names[i]
pointers.
In cases where clk names are never registered, this can be
a substantial power improvement since a mux having an unregistered
parent name will traverse the clk tree on every set_rate. This can
happen hundreds of times a second on CPU clks.
Change-Id: I85499d2e576249568ff508e424ca8d5009e6e2b1
Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index af011974d4ec..57a95c713286 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1516,9 +1516,18 @@ static int clk_fetch_parent_index(struct clk_core *core,
if (!parent)
return -EINVAL;
- for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++)
- if (clk_core_get_parent_by_index(core, i) == parent)
+ for (i = 0; i < core->num_parents; i++) {
+ if (core->parents[i] == parent)
+ return i;
+
+ if (core->parents[i])
+ continue;
+
+ if (!strcmp(parent->name, core->parent_names[i])) {
+ core->parents[i] = parent;
return i;
+ }
+ }
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.20.1.415.g653613c723-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists