[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181221075442.17109-10-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:54:41 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] driver core: drop use of BUS_ATTR()
We are trying to get rid of BUS_ATTR() so drop the last user of it from
the tree. We had to "open code" it in order to prevent a function name
conflict due to the use of DEVICE_ATTR_WO() earlier in the file :(
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/bus.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
index f10d56c61a46..575bd6d752bd 100644
--- a/drivers/base/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
@@ -830,7 +830,14 @@ static ssize_t bus_uevent_store(struct bus_type *bus,
kobject_synth_uevent(&bus->p->subsys.kobj, buf, count);
return count;
}
-static BUS_ATTR(uevent, S_IWUSR, NULL, bus_uevent_store);
+/*
+ * "open code" the old BUS_ATTR() macro here. We want to use BUS_ATTR_WO()
+ * here, but can not use it as earlier in the file we have
+ * DEVICE_ATTR_WO(uevent), which would cause a clash with the with the store
+ * function name.
+ */
+static struct bus_attribute bus_attr_uevent = __ATTR(uevent, S_IWUSR, NULL,
+ bus_uevent_store);
/**
* bus_register - register a driver-core subsystem
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists