[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <386368225.TvJUPtmGVW@blindfold>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:56:25 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
hsiangkao@...l.ru, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org, zhangjun <openzhangj@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Get/put page when changing PG_private
Am Samstag, 15. Dezember 2018, 16:01:30 CET schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> The page migration code assumes that a page with PG_private
> set has its page count elevated by 1.
> UBIFS never did this and therefore the migration code was unable
> to migrate some pages owned by UBIFS.
> The lead to situations where the CMA memory allocator failed to
> allocate memory.
>
> Fix this by using get/put_page when changing PG_private.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: zhangjun <openzhangj@...il.com>
> Fixes: 4ac1c17b2044 ("UBIFS: Implement ->migratepage()")
> Reported-by: zhangjun <openzhangj@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
FYI, on the XFS side a similar change caused a regression.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=154530861202448&w=2
Until this regression is not fully understood, including the implications
for UBIFS, I'll not merge this patch.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists