lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181221095740.GF13248@dell>
Date:   Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:57:40 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Priit Laes <plaes@...es.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] mfd: axp20x: name voltage
 ramping define properly

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Priit Laes wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 09:26:58AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Priit Laes wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:39:27AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, Priit Laes wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
> > > > > 
> > > > > The current axp20x names the ramping register 'scal' which probably
> > > > > means scaling. Since the register really has nothing to do with
> > > > > scaling, but really is the voltage ramp we rename it appropriately.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Priit Laes <plaes@...es.org>
> > > > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 4 ++--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > I've lost track of what's happening with this set now.
> > > > 
> > > > Mark,
> > > > 
> > > > Did you take this patch in the end?
> > > 
> > > Yes, this is in linux-next.
> > 
> > I have no idea why Mark's tracker isn't mailing me (this is not the
> > first time this has happened).
> > 
> > Could you please rebase this set and resubmit all of the patches which
> > have not yet been applied?
> 
> Whole serie has been applied.

Well that saves me a job.  Thanks.  =:-)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ