[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181221104705.GA4750@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:47:05 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: WANG Chao <chao.wang@...oud.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
srinivas.eeda@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: replace RETPOLINE with CONFIG_RETPOLINE
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 05:33:47PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> On 12/11/18 at 12:37P, WANG Chao wrote:
> > Since commit 4cd24de3a098 ("x86/retpoline: Make CONFIG_RETPOLINE depend
> > on compiler support"), RETPOLINE has been replaced by CONFIG_RETPOLINE.
> >
> > Fixes: 4cd24de3a098 ("x86/retpoline: Make CONFIG_RETPOLINE depend on compiler support")
> > Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <chao.wang@...oud.cn>
>
> ping ...
This one somehow slipped through the cracks... :-\
Ok, let's see: this could be relevant for the case when a module built
with a compiler which doesn't support retpolines, gets loaded on a
system which is built with retpolines.
Which is pretty seldom as the majority of setups out there should have
a retpoline-enabled compiler. And should not allow loading external
modules anyway, but that's a different story.
So, this close to the merge window, I'm inclined to delay this one after
it and have it take the x86/urgent fixes path. Unless someone screams
and says that patch breaks his system. I haven't seen any reports about
it so far so...
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists