[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1790706.irnnyc2D39@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 11:59:44 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the kbuild tree
On Friday, December 21, 2018 2:59:45 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig
>
> between commits:
>
> 2eac9c2dfb2b ("PCI: consolidate the PCI_DOMAINS and PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC config options")
> 20f1b79d3359 ("PCI: consolidate the PCI_SYSCALL symbol")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
> 52146173a033 ("arm64: select ACPI PCI code only when both features are enabled")
>
> from the pm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
The fix looks good to me, thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists