linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181221124611.GA4210@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:46:11 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf trace: use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling,
 "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*"

Em Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 08:48:09AM +0000, Colin King escreveu:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The spelling of the SECCOMP is incorrect, fix these.

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo
 
> Fixes: c65c83ffe904 ("perf trace: Allow asking for not suppressing common string prefixes")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> index 4600c28a3cfe..637722e2796b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>  static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_op(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg)
>  {
>  	bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
> -	const char *prefix = "SECOMP_SET_MODE_";
> +	const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_SET_MODE_";
>  	int op = arg->val;
>  	size_t printed = 0;
>  
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_flags(char *bf, size_t size,
>  						   struct syscall_arg *arg)
>  {
>  	bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix;
> -	const char *prefix = "SECOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
> +	const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_";
>  	int printed = 0, flags = arg->val;
>  
>  #define	P_FLAG(n) \
> -- 
> 2.19.1

-- 

- Arnaldo